What is going on at the Excel exposition centre in London's Docklands is something different from the colourful picture left. Every two year the UK capital, in the second week of September, is the hosting place for the Defence and Security Equipment International, the most important arms fair in the world.
Despite the elegant and comforting wording we are actually talking about buying and selling arms .
I don't want to be a moralist or a dreaming pacifist and I am aware that in various countries the military industry is one of the key sectors of the national economy with spin off effects on collateral industries . What I was curious about, after reading about the fair, was to check if there is any correlation or opposite trend in governments' spending for defence and development aid and the distance between the two voices in national budgets by what I came across in data and pages on Internet.
I am not going to reason about the definitions used in the documents reviewed but just presenting data that helped me understand the big picture.
According to SIPRI, world military expenditure in 2010 reached $1630 billion, representing 2.6 per cent of global gross domestic product (GDP) or $236 for each person. Spending was 1.3 per cent higher in real terms than in 2009 and 50 per cent higher than in 2001. What is surprising me is the fact that emerging economies, like the BRIC countries, becoming important regional political players, are increasing their military expenditures. In particular, significant increases
continued in 2010 in South America (5.8 per cent) and Africa (5.2 per cent). In contrast, the increases in North America (2.8 per cent) and Asia and Oceania (1.4 per cent) were lower than in recent years, while in Europe spending fell for the first time since 1998 (by 2.8 per cent).
Working in a small international organization, I am aware of the difficulties the overall international aid and cooperation community is suffering for the constant cut spending in aid, despite the efforts made to improve the effectiveness and impact of money invested in development projects and I am figuring out as just converting a 0.2/0.3 % of resources spent in arms could help improve the overall picture. As outlined by the Secretary General in a recent speech, sustainable development is the key point for the future global stability and security is sustainable development. Only regional and global partnership will help dealing with climate change and water and natural resources scarcity and management. Political confrontation and military deterrence cannot be the right path.
SIPRI 2011 yearbook - chapter 4 military expenditure
Unintended Consequences: Does Aid Promote Arms Races?
World Military Expenditures. A compilation of data and facts related to military spending, education and health
Pacifists site against the DSEI
Disarm DSEI
Worldmeters military spending
Despite the elegant and comforting wording we are actually talking about buying and selling arms .
I don't want to be a moralist or a dreaming pacifist and I am aware that in various countries the military industry is one of the key sectors of the national economy with spin off effects on collateral industries . What I was curious about, after reading about the fair, was to check if there is any correlation or opposite trend in governments' spending for defence and development aid and the distance between the two voices in national budgets by what I came across in data and pages on Internet.
I am not going to reason about the definitions used in the documents reviewed but just presenting data that helped me understand the big picture.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute |
continued in 2010 in South America (5.8 per cent) and Africa (5.2 per cent). In contrast, the increases in North America (2.8 per cent) and Asia and Oceania (1.4 per cent) were lower than in recent years, while in Europe spending fell for the first time since 1998 (by 2.8 per cent).
Working in a small international organization, I am aware of the difficulties the overall international aid and cooperation community is suffering for the constant cut spending in aid, despite the efforts made to improve the effectiveness and impact of money invested in development projects and I am figuring out as just converting a 0.2/0.3 % of resources spent in arms could help improve the overall picture. As outlined by the Secretary General in a recent speech, sustainable development is the key point for the future global stability and security is sustainable development. Only regional and global partnership will help dealing with climate change and water and natural resources scarcity and management. Political confrontation and military deterrence cannot be the right path.
Country or Area | Aid as % of gross national income | Aid, $m |
---|---|---|
Australia | 0.32 | 2668.52 |
Austria | 0.50 | 1808.46 |
Belgium | 0.43 | 1952.83 |
Canada | 0.29 | 4079.69 |
Denmark | 0.81 | 2562.23 |
Finland | 0.39 | 981.34 |
France | 0.38 | 9883.59 |
Germany | 0.37 | 12290.7 |
Greece | 0.16 | 500.82 |
Ireland | 0.55 | 1192.15 |
Italy | 0.19 | 3970.62 |
Japan | 0.17 | 7678.95 |
Luxembourg | 0.91 | 375.53 |
Netherlands | 0.81 | 6224.26 |
New Zealand | 0.27 | 319.8 |
Norway | 0.95 | 3728.02 |
Portugal | 0.22 | 470.54 |
Spain | 0.37 | 5139.8 |
Sweden | 0.93 | 4338.94 |
Switzerland | 0.37 | 1689.16 |
United Kingdom | 0.36 | 9848.54 |
United States | 0.16 | 21786.9 |
More readings:
SIPRI 2011 yearbook - chapter 4 military expenditure
Unintended Consequences: Does Aid Promote Arms Races?
World Military Expenditures. A compilation of data and facts related to military spending, education and health
Pacifists site against the DSEI
Disarm DSEI
Worldmeters military spending
No comments:
Post a Comment